Skip to content
Tuesday, October 13, 2026
Fresh Wager Group

The Worst Titles of This Year, Per Aggregate Scores

At every turn, fans are quick to share their lists of the greatest titles of 2025. However, what of the disasters, the underperformers? It's time to take a momentary detour to honor the lowest-rated games of the year, based on review aggregator Metacritic. Could each of these games truly as terrible as the ratings suggest? Let's find out.

10. Switch 2's Welcome Tour

Metascore: 54/100, Audience Score: 3.4/10

Initial reactions to this pack-in experience were colored by its $9.99 price tag, with many voicing frustration it wasn't a complimentary title like similar console launches. Critical opinion was quite mixed, from scathing critiques to more generous reviews that praised the charming software underneath the controversy. In spite of the controversy, the title proved to be a notable digital seller during its launch month.

9. Rennsport

Metascore: 53/100, User Score: 3.2/10

Presented as "more than a racing game," this driving sim from Competition Company and Teyon received largely negative reviews. The consensus was that the game fell short in nearly every way, particularly in a year packed with high-quality racing titles. In the eyes of critics, this underwhelming entry was advised to be left on the shelf.

8. Bubsy's Purrfect Collection

Metascore: 53/100, Audience Score: 8.6/10

First things first: the irritating colon usage is a silly strike against it. This collection of SNES and PS1 Bubsy titles features a sarcastic feline known for incessant quips. Reviewers noted that these games were not good to begin with and haven't gotten better with age. The notably positive user score stands as a curious anomaly to the professional reviews.

7. Hunter x Hunter Fighting Game

Metascore: 53, User Score: 3.5

This anime-inspired fighting game encountered harsh criticism from both critics and fans. Complaints centered on a limited character selection and a minimal offering of gameplay modes. User reviews was particularly negative, with some voicing a hope that the title's poor performance would have consequences for similar releases.

6. Riders Vs Dogoos

Aggregate Score: 51, Audience Score: 5.3

Hailing from the niche Hyperdimension Neptunia series, this vehicle combat game tasks players with collecting slime-like creatures. Critics argued that its attempt to recreate a unique experience didn't land, coming across as more of a low-effort product than a substantial addition to the franchise. Its 3-hour duration combined with a premium price was criticized.

5. Captain Blood

Aggregate Score: 50, Audience Score: 5.3

This title is a piece of lost media from the mid-2000s, seeing the light of day after years and years in development hell. The team behind it consciously chose to preserve the game as an original experience of its time, fully aware that contemporary players might dislike its old-school mechanics. As such, many reviews noted that the tale of its development was more interesting than the game itself.

4. Scar-Lead Salvation

Metascore: 44, User Score: 2.4

This anime-styled third-person shooter modeled after games like *Returnal* failed to impress with critics. Frequent criticisms included uninspired foes, monotonous stage design, and a snoozy narrative. A controversial mechanic involving the protagonist's clothing was universally disliked and undermined the game's enjoyment.

3. Paramedic Simulator

Aggregate Score: 44, User Score: 4.9

Think of the engaging medical sims of the past, then take out the compelling story. That, according to reviews, is roughly *Ambulance Life*. Players found the core gameplay loop to be a slog, and the treatment of its subject matter was criticized as being tone-deaf. The overall experience was deemed not very compelling.

2. Tamagotchi Plaza

Metascore: 43, User Score: 5.8

This new direction for the classic virtual pet formula turns the franchise into a minigame collection title. The result, based on critics, was a unsatisfying series of simple minigames that rapidly became boring. Some reviews went so far as to call it one of the lowest-quality titles available on its platform, pointing to a dearth of depth.

1. MindsEye

Aggregate Score: 37, User Score: 2.5

Arriving as a major crime saga from a studio led by industry veterans, *MindsEye* was a notable critical flop. Reviews heavily criticized its poor shooting mechanics, uninspired storytelling, and a multitude of game-breaking glitches. Critics found it to be a regression compared to previous-generation games in the action genre. Amidst the scathing reviews, a few of fans found value in the experience, offering a distinct contrast.

TK
The writer

Thomas Khan

A seasoned sports analyst with over a decade of experience in predictive modeling and betting strategy development.

Fresh Wager Group

Type to search articles.